Executive-ready summary with severity-based findings, reproducible evidence, and engineering-aligned remediation guidance — mapped to WCAG 2.2 AA.
Audit status
Executive risk
Remediation priority
Estimated compliance readiness
59 / 100
Executive summary
The site demonstrates a strong visual design system, but several critical user flows contain accessibility blockers increasing compliance risk and reducing task completion for keyboard and assistive-technology users.
Highest-priority issues affect forms, focus visibility, dialog behavior, and content contrast in conversion-critical areas.
Scope
Methodology
Remediation timeline
Discovery & scope
Pages, user flows, and design system components selected
Manual audit
Keyboard, screen-reader, contrast, and interaction testing completed
Engineering remediation
Critical and serious issues prioritized for implementation sprint
Validation round
Retest after fixes and confirm status by issue — certificate issued
Findings
Sorted by severity · click to expand
User impact
Screen-reader users cannot reliably identify field purpose, blocking task completion.
Evidence
Name, email, and message inputs rely solely on placeholder text. Labels are absent from DOM and not announced by assistive technologies.
Remediation
Associate visible <label> elements with each input via htmlFor/id pairing. Preserve placeholder text as supplementary hint, not primary instruction.
User impact
Keyboard-only users lose track of current position while navigating menus and interactive components.
Evidence
Focus ring is removed on all header links and primary CTA buttons. Hover styling does not translate to accessible focus indicators.
Remediation
Restore high-contrast focus ring using focus-visible:ring or outline with ≥3:1 contrast ratio, persistent on all interactive states.